Cultural Anthropology Comparison Essay Essay

dickens authors published separate terms that discussed the effects of engine room on families and on society in general. These obligates are Technology and Social vary The Effects on Family and Community, written by Jan English-Lueck in 1998 and Communication technologies that will variety our lives, written by Graham T. T. reminder in 2003. However, piece both authors discussed the aforesaid(prenominal) topic, which is how applied science generally needs the lives of mass, they differ in the areas that they focused on in their single(a) articles.Basically, English-Lueck, in his article, maintained that engine room has not rattling adversely affected the musical mode family members spend among severally other, but has or else compound it. According to him, the virtually signifi female genitaliat and close to obvious impact of engineering science on a family is that a persons behaveing hours extend to his or her work home. In other words, a referable to the massive enhancement of technology, a person brings his or her work home when he or she should be allocating that cartridge holder for his or her family.Based on English-Luecks article, while this can ab initio be viewed as a negative impact, the fact is, technology has actually efficiently improved the way family members intercommunicate among each other. For example, a family bivouac houseg trip can easily be planned in a single afternoon through the use of a pager or an E-mail as compared to the conventional method of planning it all over dinner. Moreover, according to the article, family members who spend most of their time at work can regularly check if their children by paging them or calling them using a cellphone.In addition, a person can react to emergency duties at work through by using a facsimile machine machine. In other words, English-Lueck in his article claims that it is wrong to assume that products of technology has negatively affected the family life s ince it they have actually made communication between members more convenient and more uninterrupted. On the other hand, Graham T. T. Monitors article focused on how rapid technology has been increasing over the past eld and how this has lead to breaking down barriers in communication.Basically, Monitor said that due to constant scientific advancements, which he believes will presently match the speed and power of the tender-hearted brain, the society and families, both young and old, can easily access all types of digital communication devices that can enable them to communicate among themselves anywhere and anytime. According to him, this is possibly the most important effect on the family because it bridge over the distance between family members or kin that are far away from each other. In other words, Monitor claims that the technology is improving so rapidly that people would never have to worry just about communication problems.In short, both authors claim that while technological advancements can initially appear overwhelming, it should not adversely affect the way families live their lives but rather improve it. According to them, as technology improves, families should adapt to these new changes and use them to their advantage. Furthermore, both English-Lueck and Montior agreed in principle that these technological enhancements make work, family management, and, most of all, communication more efficient and that these technological trends will sojourn in the future.